论坛全局菜单下方 - TICKMILL 285X70论坛全局菜单下方 - ThinkMarkets285X70论坛全局菜单下方 - 荔枝返现285X70论坛全局菜单下方 -  icmarkets285X70
查看:687回复:0
duskbird
注册时间2006-11-26
Barron's上的文章
楼主发表于:2007-05-11 03:48只看该作者倒序浏览
1楼 电梯直达
电梯直达
前几天的文章了,大家看看当看看。 TUESDAY, MAY 8, 2007 INVESTORS' SOAPBOX AM Dollar Could Buck the Steady Slide Prudential Equity Research ACCORDING TO RUSSELL INDEXES, the total returns in dollar terms of both developed and emerging markets outside the U.S. have topped the U.S. through the first third of 2007 as well as over the past one, three and five years. Part of the explanation for the outperformance of non-U.S. markets has been the steady decline of the dollar; if a market stays flat for the year but its currency gains 10% versus the dollar, a U.S. investor will see a 10% gain. U.S. investors in mutual funds have successfully timed this performance of both markets and currency, since flows to foreign funds have easily topped domestic funds over the past few years. So far, this diversification looks like a free lunch, both boosting returns and reducing risk. Quants like us are deep believers in the benefits of diversification from a long-term perspective, but will the double-barreled gains of both markets and currency continue indefinitely? Might the dollar rebound at some point, and might the U.S. equity market eventually outperform? Based on estimates for the current and next fiscal years, U.S. stocks look to be a multiple point or two higher than stocks in the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Italy. But analysts projected long-term growth rates are much higher for the U.S., about 12% versus about 7% for each of the continental European markets. Not surprisingly, analysts expect fast profit growth for China, India and Brazil. But China sports a much higher price-to-earnings multiple than the U.S., and emerging markets in general have historically been much more volatile than the U.S. For investors with a long time horizon and true experts to guide them, allocations to emerging markets probably make sense. But given the big run that they have had, is it not possible that emerging markets might correct a bit, or at least lag the U.S.? Despite the weak dollar over the past few years and a big increase in energy prices, U.S. inflation has remained fairly tame, as importers seem to have held the line on prices to defend share in the big U.S. market. Equity prices have risen for more than four years despite the weak dollar. We suggest that the best way to interpret this result is to conclude that, historically, a weak dollar has hurt equities to the extent that the weak currency creates higher inflation. That is, absent a pickup in inflation, currency hasn't had much influence on U.S. stocks. Indeed, the weak dollar has clearly helped earnings (as usual), and it's not unreasonable, it seems to us, to conclude that in this cycle the weak dollar has been a small net plus for U.S. equity investors, at least viewed solely in dollar terms. We have never pretended to be currency experts, but in addition to interest-rate differentials, over time currencies tend to follow fundamental patterns. The simplest way of measuring this over the years has been The Economist magazine's Big Mac index. That is, McDonald's has stores around the world that sell a similar product. Londoners are not going to fly to New York to save a few shillings on a hamburger, but they might do so (and based on anecdotal reports, frequently do so) to save money on jeans or jewelry; the burger is just a proxy. By this index, the dollar is about 20% undervalued versus the pound and euro, though overvalued by about the same amount versus the yen and 50% overvalued versus the Chinese yuan. If purchasing power parity asserts itself over the next few years, we might expect the dollar to weaken further versus the yen and the yuan, but it might strengthen versus the pound and the euro. Globally, the dollar's steady slide might end sometime in 2007, especially if we are correct that the relatively weak growth of the U.S. turns to relatively strong over the next several quarters. We are increasing our 2007 Standard and Poor's 500 target to 1650 and introducing a 2008 target Of 1880. In light of the strong first-quarter earnings we are increasing our 2008 S&P 500 operating earnings-per-share forecast to $103 from $102 (keeping 2007 at $95 for now, above the bottom-up consensus). If we are right about the market outlook and if the dollar stops falling, global investors might reverse the trades of the last few years, as non-U.S. investors increase U.S. allocations and U.S. investors bring their money home.
TK29帖子1楼右侧xm竖版广告90-240
个性签名

VICISSITUDE

广告
TK30+TK31帖子一樓廣告
TK30+TK31帖子一樓廣告

本站免责声明:

1、本站所有广告及宣传信息均与韬客无关,如需投资请依法自行决定是否投资、斟酌资金安全及交易亏损风险;

2、韬客是独立的、仅为投资者提供交流的平台,网友发布信息不代表韬客的观点与意思表示,所有因网友发布的信息而造成的任何法律后果、风险与责任,均与韬客无关;

3、金融交易存在极高法律风险,未必适合所有投资者,请不要轻信任何高额投资收益的诱导而贸然投资;投资保证金交易导致的损失可能超过您投入的资金和预期。请您考虑自身的投资经验及风险承担能力,进行合法、理性投资;

4、所有投资者的交易帐户应仅限本人使用,不应交由第三方操作,对于任何接受第三方喊单、操盘、理财等操作的投资和交易,由此导致的任何风险、亏损及责任由投资者个人自行承担;

5、韬客不隶属于任何券商平台,亦不受任何第三方控制,韬客不邀约客户投资任何保证金交易,不接触亦不涉及投资者的任何资金及账户信息,不代理任何交易操盘行为,不向客户推荐任何券商平台,亦不存在其他任何推荐行为。投资者应自行选择券商平台,券商平台的任何行为均与韬客无关。投资者注册及使用韬客即表示其接受和认可上述声明,并自行承担法律风险。

版权所有:韬客外汇论坛 www.talkfx.com 联络我们:[email protected]